I don't think Mamet is being dishonest, I think he just reveals the limits of his own understanding and experience, while berating liberals for their own inability to comprehend conservatives because so few of them actually interact with conservatives. So, in summary, The Secret Knowledge will probably fire up those who are already converts to the cause and regular readers of National Review.
Its short chapters are just bullet points of conservative ideology. He makes his points with literary style rather than bombast and vitriol.
Americans Have Given Up on Public Schools. That’s a Mistake.
Well, there is some vitriol. But it's pretty much the same message. So this book is unlikely to win over your liberal friends and make them question their beliefs. Aug 06, John Parker rated it did not like it Shelves: i-just-wasn-t-that-into-you. I was so disappointed with this book.
Not sure where to start, except that it was annoying book and said nothing. Secret Knowledge and I mean this, I'm not kidding, I promise , had more parenthetical phrases and I mean literally parenthetical, not figurative, being that the phrases represented rabbit chasing trains of thought and were offset by parenthesis than any other book and I'm not exaggerating here I've ever as it were read.
And that wasn't annoying enough--it also made frequent us I was so disappointed with this book. The book read as though Mamet dictated it into a tape machine and the typist cranked it out the way he spoke it. Beyond that annoyance, the book made broad, blanket generalizations about everything from liberal arts colleges to the way people stand in elevators, without any specifics to back up his statements. He simply said them and expected others to accept them.
Not at all a thought provoking or helpful book. A classic case of "If this guy wasn't already famous, there's no way that book would have been published. Aug 15, Douglas Wilson rated it it was amazing Shelves: politics. What a glorious book. This was a wonderful book.
What a book. Mar 09, Mark rated it really liked it. A bit wordy at times, but overall quite good. It is not greed for money, but covetousness born of envy - the desire for that which legally belongs to another. That those in favor of this may not want the actual money for their own use is beside the point - they want the enjoyment of the power to strip the money fro A bit wordy at times, but overall quite good. That those in favor of this may not want the actual money for their own use is beside the point - they want the enjoyment of the power to strip the money from another.
They may not use the confiscated funds to buy a car or a meal, but the billionaire who earns another million dollars cannot spend it either - he, like the offended Liberal, is enjoying the warm glow of its possession. A rampant and untrammeled glee, an unchecked ambition for gain is, in the individual, called miserliness; in the society which strips him of it, it is called Socialism.
May 27, Hadrian rated it did not like it Shelves: politics-and-foreign-policy , nonfiction , biography-memoir. A damned frustrating book.
I had hoped that Mamet, with his almost legendary insight into the nature of modern society, would be able to offer some worthy critiques. But instead, I find a ragged cynical Tea Party convert, able to offer none but the most useless and infuriating of cliches, defending Sarah Palin and Deepak Chopra, dismissing science as a hoax, and claiming that there is a conspiracy conducted by the entire spectrum of leftists. It's a damn shame that Mamet has fallen so far, and a A damned frustrating book. It's a damn shame that Mamet has fallen so far, and a damn shame that people will waste their money.
Jul 13, Libyrinths rated it liked it.
See a Problem?
Mamet has done what many of us have gradually done of late: awakened to the delusional and destructive nature of leftist constructs. Perhaps this is happening more lately because today there aren't just nice liberals anymore, but full-fledged leftists in the forefront. Mamet uses a great deal of personal reflection to make his arguments, making his book not just some political formulation, but one of personal insights and reflections.
He recognizes how easy it had been not to think, but to just Mamet has done what many of us have gradually done of late: awakened to the delusional and destructive nature of leftist constructs. He recognizes how easy it had been not to think, but to just go along with the crowd in what had always just seemed right.
Upon recognizing at one point how he was perhaps parroting things he didn't agree with, he started thinking, reading, reflecting. Mamet is articulate and impassioned. He read widely as he began questioning, and that is reflected in his arguments. He also doesn't refrain from citing literature or friends which provided insights for him. His bibliography at the end of the book isn't one of books of shallow political screed, but of books which require attention and intellect to explore, as one would expect from someone of his intelligence.
He also reflects on his new viewpoint through the lens of his Jewishness and of Jewish traditional teachings. This was refreshing. Clearly Mamet didn't just adopt a new set of intellectual arguments, but integrated his changes all the way through.
- Principles of Management for the Hospitality Industry (The Management of Hospitality and Tourism Enterprises)!
- the Poetry of id.
- How to Break Bad News to People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Guide for Carers and Professionals;
A readable and enjoyable book, one which needed an extra comma here and there for clarity, but articulately sparkled with wit, warmth and insight. Aug 26, Bob Zeidman rated it it was amazing. Really great. An eloquent series of rambling essays on the foolishness of liberal philosophy by a "reformed liberal.
The book is very well researched and very well annotated. I had the privilege of having dinner with David a few weeks ago and the pleasure of discussing these concepts with someone I admired long before I knew he was a conservative thinker a Really great. I had the privilege of having dinner with David a few weeks ago and the pleasure of discussing these concepts with someone I admired long before I knew he was a conservative thinker and long before he knew it.
Now that I've finished it I hope I get another chance to discuss its contents with him and to get his feedback on my book too. May 02, Bob rated it it was ok.
- the Case against Assad (Middle East essays Book 1).
- Latest releases;
- The Secret Knowledge: On the Dismantling of American Culture Summary & Study Guide.
- Baseball Fantography: A Celebration in Snapshots and Stories from the Fans.
I read this because a friend of mine recommended it. I borrowed it from the library. He is an interesting read. His plays are probably better. I am trying to understand the other side or other people's "conservative" opinions, especially my friend's. There is a wide range of opinions on many issues but the liberal vs conservative distinction Mamet seems comfortable promoting.
This book about the fact there is no "secret knowledge" is perhaps better titled something else like "What is wrong with t I read this because a friend of mine recommended it. This book about the fact there is no "secret knowledge" is perhaps better titled something else like "What is wrong with the Liberals". Some of the opinions I appreciate.
I agree that it is wrong to be a "brain-dead" liberal. I think there are many "brain-alive" liberals. So having read that book, I was trying to understand Mamet's expressions and concerns.follow link
This Is How You Dismantle Our Government | Dame Magazine
I think I get most of it. I get that. It is a messy situation full of revengeful hatred and easily builds walls. People who take advantage of some programs' loopholes or the fact that there is not enough responsible action required. He did not want to fight for his country during the Vietnam war then and is now still fighting government ideas on behalf of personal freedoms - kind of a libertarian theme. So I think he is ready to throw out the notion that government has a role in promoting common concerns and infrastructure or at least willing to greatly reduce what is considered to be government common concern claiming it is inefficient.
On Global Warming - The fact that he chooses to trust a minority of scientists that claim man made CO2 is not contributing to global warming is an interesting contrast. I think he has a valid point to raise questions of trust in authority whether they be political or from science.